Version-1 (Jan-Feb-2013)
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract:The main aim of the study is to evaluate the structural dimensions and functions of structure
influencing agribusiness enterprises: mechanistic vs. organic systems approach. Systematic or quasi-random
sampling was used. The sample size for this research was made up of twenty (26) small-to-medium scale
agribusiness enterprises in Benue State, Nigeria, from a population of fifty two (52). One hundred and two (102)
respondents were framed for this study. Preliminary analysis sub-divided agribusiness enterprises into
mechanistic and organic enterprises. The mechanistic agribusiness enterprises had higher correlations in terms
of written procedures, job descriptions, policy manuals and rules and regulations. Tasks performed by organic
agribusiness enterprises are not fractionated and the levels of job qualification were not highly specialized
compared to mechanistic enterprises. Respondents in mechanistic and overall agribusiness enterprises had a
more dissatisfied feeling when decisions are made exclusively by top management. For organic agribusiness
enterprises to be innovative, they must improve on their formalization of job descriptions, policy manuals and
rules and regulations. To improve the image of employees and the organization, vertical differentiation and the
number of supervisors in organic agribusiness enterprises must be increased and defined properly. Mechanistic
agribusiness enterprises should allow decentralization so as to foster intrapreneurship.
Keywords: Agribusiness, functions of structure, mechanistic, organic, structural dimensions, synergy
[1] Alibi, M. (1991). Industrial Capacity Utilization Dips in First Half. Financial Guardian, Monday, Nov. 4: 15.
[2] Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
[3] Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge M.A: MIT
Press. p.21
[4] Daft, R.L. (1986). Organizational Theory and Design. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company. pp. 15-18.
[5] Ellis, F. (1988). Peasant economics: farm households and agrarian development. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
[6] Federal Republic of Nigeria Industrial Directory (2010)
[7] Hensher, M. (2001). Financing health systems through efficiency gains. CMH working paper series. Paper no. WG3: 2.
[8] Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1969). Organization and Environment. Homewood, I.L. Irwin.
[9] Olayide, S.O. and Heady, E.O. (1982). Introduction to agricultural production. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press. 319 pp.
[10] Ottih, L.O. (2006). Organization theory: Structure, design and process. Port Harcourt, Nigeria:Amex Publications. 119 pp.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: The overall objective of this research is to carry out an environmental analysis and diagnosis of
catfish enterprises in Benue State, Nigeria. A sample size of 143 catfish production enterprises was selected
through simple stratified multi-stage random sampling design. A successful response rate of 79.7% was
achieved as 114 of the questionnaires were considered acceptable. Majority of the respondents were of the
opinion that government collaboration with local and foreign organizations was not enough and had produced
a weak threat to catfish enterprises. Majority of the respondents had a strong threat view to the fact that
interest rates, value of the Naira (N) and tax rates discouraged new investment and business expansion. A more
specific ETOP was developed for each key environmental factor by using the critical indices for each factor.
This was done for determining the amount of opportunities and threats likely in the near future for five business
environment features. Since most of the factors were positive, if the firm has the resources and competences, the
obvious choice is to employ growth strategy. Managerial attitude towards risk and corporate politics are factors
that could encourage growth strategy away from maintenance strategy.
Keywords: Business cycles, environmental analysis, diagnosis, fiscal policies, technology
[1] Abdul R. A. A. and Abdul A. H. (1999). Pengurusan Projek: Perspektif Industri pembinaan Pulau Pinang. Penerbit USM.
[2] Adedeji, O.B. and Okocha, R.C. (2012). Constraint to aquaculture development in Nigeria and way forward. Journal of Applied
Science Research, 7(7):1133-1140.
[3] Angba, A.O. (2000). Determination of sustained use of selected technologies Recommended to farmersby Cross River State
Agriculture development programme (ADP). Ph.D Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development,
University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
[4] Ball, D.A., McCulloch, Jr. W.H., Frantz, P.L., Geringer, J.M. and Minor, M.S. (2002). International business: The challenge of global
competition. (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[5] Dlamini, B. M. (2003). Effective linkages among national agricultural research institute, universities and extension systems;
challenges and opportunities. In P.Anandajayasekeram & R. J. Sebola (Eds.). Science and technology strategy for improved
agricultural productivity and food security. (proc) South Africa/ Inter Academy council. Megaliesberg, South Africa.
[6] Fagbenro, O. A. (2005). Aquaculture in Nigeria: history, status and prospects. A report of FAO WorldFish Centre Workshop.
Cameroon.
[7] FAO(2007).StateofWorldFisheriesandAquaculture.Retrievedfrom http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/fisoft/fishplu.asp.
[8] Gluek, W.F. (1980). Strategic management and business policy. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company. pp 44-50.
[9] Gupta M.V, Bartley D.M and Acosta B.O (2004). Use of genetically improved and alien species for aquaculture biodiversity in
Africa. World Food Centre. p.107.
[10] Joshua, A. and Omidiji, M.O. (2002). Rural development strategy in Nigeria, West and Central Africa. Paper presented at the
international workshop on rural development in West and Central Africa. IITA, Ibadan. June 3-5.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: This paper discusses emerging demographic patterns and its opportunities and challenges for U.P.
Demographic change in India is opening up new economic opportunities. As in many countries, declining infant
and child mortality helped to flash lower fertility, effectively resulting in a temporary baby boom. Moreover,
changes in population age structure have opened the door to increased prosperity. Uttar Pradesh is the most
populous state in India with a population of 199,581,477 million people as of 1 March 2011. If it were a
separate country, Uttar Pradesh would be the world's fifth most populous nation, next only to China. Population
growth of Uttar Pradesh in 2011 is 20.09%, Sex Ratio is 908 in 2011. Economic and demographic factors
reveal important and significant influences.
Keywords: transition, literacy, sex-ratio, poverty, population growth.
[1] Alsan, Marcella, David E. Bloom, and David Canning (2006). ―The Effect of Population Health on Foreign Direct Investment
Inflows to Low- and Middle-Income Countries‖, World Development, April, Vol. 34, No. 4, 613-630.
[2] Population growth- trends, projections, challenges and opportunities
[3] Census of India; 5—SRS, Registrar General of India; —Family Welfare Statistics in India, 2006; —Selected Educational Statistics,
2004–05; —Census of India, Registrar General of India—NRCW Website; 18—Statistics on Women, National Institute of Public
Cooperation and Child Development 2007;—NCRB Website.
[4] Deciphering the 2011 Census Results Agell, J., T. Lindh, and H. Ohlsson. 1997. ―Growth and the public sector: A critical review
essay.‖ European
[5] Journal of Political Economy 13(1): 33-52.
[6] Aghion, P. and P. Howitt. 1992. ―A model of growth through creative destruction CENSUS 2011 PROVISIONAL POPULATION
TOTALS: 323-351.
[7] An, C.-B. and S.-H. Jeon. 2006. ―Demographic change and economic growth: An inverted-U shape relationship.‖ Economics
Letters 92: 447-454.
[8] Jones, C. I. 1995. ―R&D–based models of economic growth.‖ Journal of Political Economy 103: 759-783.
[9] The Relationship between Demographic Growth and Economic Change.
[10] Census 2011: Provisional Population Totals-www.censusgov.in
