iosr-JRME   Volume-12 ~ Issue-6 ~ Nov. – Dec. 2022

Abstract: The This article analyzes some solutions about infrastructure and facilities service learning for TNUT students in the state to come back new normal after closing the school period for two years continuous to prevent expanded infection of Covid epidemic 19 at Thai Nguyen University of Technology (TNUT).

Keywords: Solutions, Infrastructure, Facilities, New normal, Learning, After, Covid19

[1]. C. Namitha, Modern methods of teaching, Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 2018 ( Suppl 1), S39-S41.
[2]. Mihyar Hesson, Kaneez Fatima Shad. A Student-Centered Learning Model. American Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (9): 628-636, 2007.
[3]. M. Vijayalaksmi, Modern teaching Techniques in education, February 2019, Conference: Educational Technology in teacher education in the 21st Century At Government College of Education for Women, Coimbatore.
[4]. W B Strong, RM Malina, C.J. R Blimkie, S.R Daniels, R.K Dish man, B Gutin, A.C Hergenro eder, A. Must, P.A Nixon, J.M Pivornik, T. Rowland, Strost, F Otrudeau. Evidence based physical activity for school- aged youth. Journal of pediatrics, 146 (2005) pp 732- 737.
[5]. Wong, D (2006). A critical literature review on learning limitations. Journal for the Advancement of Science and Arts, 55-62.

Abstract: The research focuses on finding out which factors affect teachers' use of ICT in assessment in the Northern midland and mountainous region of Vietnam through a questionnaire. With 104 teachers participating in a survey from June 2022 to October 2022, it has been shown that there are many factors that affect teachers' decision to use or not to use ICT in the teaching and learning process. Besides, SPSS software was usedto process the survey results. It can be shown that when the teachers in the midland and mountainous region of Vietnam apply ICT in the assessment process, they are influenced by subjective factors in the assessment process, such as teacher's attitude andperception, or objective factors such as influence from colleagues, students, administrators and other control factors.

Key Word: ICT in assessment, technology in education, ICT-based assessment, ICT skill, Vietnam

[1]. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alzahrani, A. I., Yahaya, N., Alalwan, N., & Kamin, Y. B. (2020). Digital Communication: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage for Education Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125052
[2]. Awang, Z. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis Second Edition. UiTM Press.
[3]. Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative Learning and Innovative Teaching: Final Report on the Study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in EU Member States. In JRC Research Reports (No. JRC62370; JRC Research Reports). Joint Research Centre (Seville site). https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc62370.html
[4]. Council, E. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competencies for lifelong learning. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, 30(12), 2006.
[5]. Educational media center, 2021, Launching the program "Waves and computers for you": Sowing seeds of love, https://moet.gov.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-tong-hop.aspx?ItemID=7514.

Abstract: Assessments evaluate students' learning and deliver relevant information institutions use to modify their plans and improve the learning process (Lynch, 2018). According to Basera (2019), Higher Education students are exposed to predominately two strategies of assessment; Formative assessments (FA) and Summative assessments(SA). FA is delivered continually; regularly or spontaneously-formally or informally (Tomlinson, 2014; William 2013) to evaluate students' existing learning gaps; to provide nonjudgmental effective feedback for students to improve (Kibble, 2016......

[1]. Ali, M., Asim, H., Edhi, Al., Hashmi, MD., Khan, MS., Naz, F., Qaiser, KN., Qureshi, SM., Zahid, MF., Jehan, I. (2015). Does academic assessment system type affect levels of academic stress in medical students? A cross-sectional study from Pakistan. Med Educ Online 20:27706,2015 doi:10.3402/meo.v20.37706
[2]. Aoumeur, H. (2017). The Impact of Class Size on Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language: The Case of the Department of English at Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University. Arab World English Journal, 8 (2). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.25
[3]. Archer, E. (2017). The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment. Front. Educ. 2:41. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00041
[4]. Basera, H, C. (2019). Learners Perceptions of Assessment Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Education and e-learning Research 6(2), 76-81. doi: 10.20448/journal.509.2019.62.76.81

Abstract: E-learning almost abruptly became a crucial learning strategy for educational institutions during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary school layer of education was receiving its first major encounter with e-learning as a sole means instructing the students for a part of nearly seven months total and partial lockdowns imposed in many countries. The Secondary Schools in Zamfara State also experimented this along with many Nigerian schools using such channels as Radio, TV and the internet and related remote learning strategies. This paper looked at the evidence......

Keywords: e-learning; Quality Education; Resources& Delivery

[1]. Andersson, A., &Gronlund, A. (2009). A conceptual framework for e-learning in developing countries: A critical review of research challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(8), 1–16.
[2]. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., &Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and information technologies, 25(6), 5261-5280.
[3]. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, theinstructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
[4]. Bello, B.(2021). Students Dis-engagement &E-learning Adaptively As Key Challenge for FOR Post-Covid 19 E-Learning System in Nigeria.Sokoto Educational Review, 20(1&2), 30-39.
[5]. Chibueze, M. N., &Chukwuji, C. N. (2021). Library Resources for Secondary Schools in Gusau metropolis: Educational Implications. COVENANT JOURNAL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

Abstract: The aim of this study is to find out if there is any significant difference in students' ability enhancement between those who were taught using Group Discussion strategy and those who were taught using Think Pair Share strategy. This study is a quantitative research method using comparative design by using pre-test and post-test. This study was designed to find out the answer to the following question: Is there any significant difference in students' speaking ability enhancement between those who were taught by using Group Discussion strategy and those who were.....

Key words: Group Discussion, Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, the first year students, Think Pair Share strategy, speaking ability enhancement.

[1]. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching byPrinciples: An Interactive Approachto Language Pedagogy. New York :Longman.
[2]. Florez, S. (2010). Learner Training inForeign/Second Language Learning. London : Longman.
[3]. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., &Airasian, P. W. (2012).Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications (10thed).Boston: Pearson.
[4]. Harmer,Jeremy. (2001).The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Longman
[5]. Huda Miftahul. (2011). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Kusrini, Endang. (2012). Teaching Speakingfor Senior High School Students UsingCooperative Learning "Think-PairShare