Volume-7 ~ Issue-3
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Background: In Breast cancer there is paradigm shift towards its prevention and early detection. Self breast examination and clinical breast examination plays an important role in early detection. Currently a combination of three tests, i.e. clinical examination, radiological imaging (mammography, ultrasonography) and pathology called as triple assessment test is used as Gold standard in diagnosing all palpable breast lumps. Together they give sensitivity of 99%. The triple assessment is taken as positive if any of the three components is positive and negative only if all of its components are negative for malignancy. Materials And Methods This study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Rama Medical College Kanpur over a period of 4 years from March 2009 to Feb.2013. A total of 400 patients with a breast lump were selected irrespective of age. A detailed history, thorough clinical examination, radiological imaging and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) were used as diagnostic tools for screening of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of triple assessment in the early detection of breast carcinoma. Results The sensitivity and specificity of all the modalities used in triple assessment when combined together was100% and 99.3%, respectively. The concordance for the triple assessment was 99.3%, positive predictive value was 93.3%, negative predictive value was 100%, sensitivity was100% and specificity was 99.3%. p value was significant (0.000). Conclusion Triple assessment is a very useful diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with breast lumps and to detect patients with breast cancers with an overall accuracy of 99.3%.
Keywords: Clinical examination, Carcinoma, Fine-needle aspiration cytology,Mammography, Ultrasonography,
[1] Bland KI, Beenken S, Copeland EM III (2005) The Breast.Schwartz‟s PrincipSurg 16:454
[2] Iglehart JD, Kaelin CM (2004) Diseases of the breast. In:Sabiston Text Book of Surgery; 17th edition, Vol. 1; pp 877
[3] Yang WT, Mok CO, King W, Tang, Metreweli C (1996)Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluationof p3lpable breast masses in Chinese women: Alternative tomammography. J Ultrasound Med 15(9):637–644
[4] Pande AR, Lohani B, Sayami P, Pradhan (2003) Predictivevalue of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breastIndian J Surg (March–April 2010) 72:97–103 103123lump. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 1(2):78–84
[5] Shetty MK, Shah YP, Sharman RS (2003) Prospective evaluationof the value of combined mammographic and Sonographicassessment in patients with palpable abnormalities.J Ultrasound Med 22(3):263–268, quiz 2670
[6] Martelli G, Pilotti S, Coopmans de Yoldi G, ViganottiG,Fariselli G, Lepera P, Moglia D (1990) Diagnostic efficacy ofphysical examination, mammography, fine needle aspirationcytology (Triple test) in solid breast lumps: An analysis of1708 consecutive cases. Tumouri 76(5):476–479
[7] Kaufman Z, Shpitz B, Shapiro M, Rona R, Lew S, DinbarA(1994) Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breastmasses: Combined physical examination, mammography,and fine-needle aspiration. J SurgOncol 56(4):254–257
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Sputum microscopy, the most commonly practiced tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic test is less sensitive in immunocompromised patients due to low bacillary load.The study was carried out in a tertiary care general hospital during 2010-12 in Mysore, Karnataka, to diagnose smear negative TB in HIV patients by culture technique.Of416 HIV patients, 162 patients with features of pulmonary/extrapulmonary TB but smear negative were included in the study.Sputum, stool, blood and other relavent clinical samplese except blood were processed as per standard protocol. The blood collected with sodium citrate was processed by lysiscentrifugation .All samples were inoculated onto Lowstein Jensen slants and incubated at 370c for 6 to 8 weeks.Of 162 HIV patients, 67(41%) were found to have TB. Extrapulmonary TB (25%) was more common than pulmonary TB (13%). Mycobacteria were recovered in 76 samples (26 sputum, 12 stool, 18 blood, 7 pleural fluid, 1 CSF, 9 FNAC, 1 ascitic fluid, 1pus ,1 ear discharge). M.tuberculosis (95%) was the predominant species isolated followed by M.avium complex (5%).Most HIV patients with TB are left undiagnosed for reasons of no advanced/high cost techniques in resource constrained settings. Thus culture could be used as a tool in diagnosing smear negative TB.
Keywords: Culture, HIV, Smear negative, Tuberculosis.
[1]. Source: HIV and Hepatitis C Annual Update. Management of Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients. 2012. [cited 2012 Dec 31]. Available from http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Annual%20Updates/2012%20Annual%20Update/Modules/TB_HIV_Management.aspx
[2]. Elston JW, Thaker HK, Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis,Indian J DermatolVenereolLeprol74(3),2008,194-199.
[3]. Cattamanchi A, Davis JL, Worodria W, YOO S, Matovu J, Kiidha J, et al,Poor performance of universal sample processing method for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by smear microscopy and culture in Uganda,J ClinMicrobiol,46(10),2008,3325-9.
[4]. World Health Organization. Geneva: Improving the diagnosis and treatment of smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis among adults and adolescents: recommendations for HIV-prevalent and resource-constrained settings. 2006.
[5]. WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Tuberculosis. Report on conclusions and recommendations, 11–13 June, 2007, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. [cited 2012 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/events/stag_report_2007.pdf. [6]. Rouillon A, Perdrizet S, Parrot R, Transmission of tubercle bacilli: The effects of chemotherapy, Tubercle, 57(4),1976,275–299.
[7]. Heifets LB, Cangelosi GA, Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a neglected problem at the turn of the century, Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,3(7),1999,564–581.
[8]. Drobniewski FA, Caws M, Gibson A, Young D, Modern laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis, Lancet Infect Dis,3(3),2003,141–147.
[9]. Kiehn TE, Cammarata R, Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, J ClinMicrobiol,24(5),1986,708-711.
[10]. Christie JD, Callihan DR, The laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial diseases. Challenges and common sense,Clin Lab Med, 15(2),1995,279-306.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
| Paper Type | : | Research Paper |
| Title | : | Arthroscopy and HRUS Correlation in IDK |
| Country | : | India |
| Authors | : | Dr. A. Sundeep Kund Reddy, Dr. T. Rajani |
| : | 10.9790/0853-0731315 ![]() |
Abstract: In a prospective study we invistigated internal derangement of knee (IDK) with High resolution ultrasound (HRUS). Aim was to determine effectiveness of ultrasound in diagnosing IDK and to compare with Arthroscopy. Ultrasound showed good sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (90.6% ) and the figures were comparable toarthroscopic findings. We conclude that ultrasound is a simple, accurate, inexpensive and non invasive way of diagnosing knee disorders with a learning curve.
Keywords – Arthroscopy, Diagnostic Knee tests, High Resolution Ultra sound (HRUS), Internal derangement of Knee(IDK), X-rays of Knee.
[1]. H Gerngross, C. Sohn. Ultrasound Scanning For The Diagnosis Of Meniscal Lesions Of The Knee Joint.( Arthroscopy 1992 ) 8 :105-110.
[2]. J. Grifka , J. Richter , M Gumtau . Clinical And Sonographic Meniscus Diagnosis.(Orthopäde 1994) 23 : 102-111.
[3]. F Corbetti , G Tomasella . Meniscal Injuries Of The Knee - Arthrographic And Echographic Study.(Radiol Med 1989) 77 : 187-194.
[4]. M Fusting , HR Casser . Dynamic Examination Technique In Meniscus Sonography. (Sportverletz Sportschaden 1991) 5 : 27-36.
[5]. HR Casser , M Fusting . Current Developments In Ultra Sonography Of The Meniscus. (Orthopäde 1993) 22 : 307-316.
[6]. T Heuchemer , G Bauer , Friedrich, Bargon. Clinical Use Of Meniscus Sonography.(Bildgebung 1987–1989) 56 : 118-123.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) is a clinico radiological entity. Symptomatology includes cognitive and behavioural disturbances, blurred vision, seizures, headache, vomiting. MRI reveals edematous changes in white and grey matter of brain. The most common etiology of PRES is Hypertensive encephalopathy, Eclampsia, Preeclampsia, Immunosuppressant drugs and cytotoxic drugs. PRES is usually reversible and the treatment is based on the management and withdrawal of the triggering factor. We report a case of PRES, occurred after consuming alcohol while on Disulfuram which is a rare etiological entity.
Keywords: Cortical Blindness, Disulfuram and alcohol induced PRES, Focal neurological signs.
[1] Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 1: fundamental imaging and clinical features. AJNR Am J euroradiol 2008;29:1036-42.
[2] Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 2: controversies surrounding pathophysiology of vasogenic edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29: 1043-49.
[3] Hinchey J. Chaves C, Appignani B, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996;334:494-500. [4] Casey SO, Sampaio RC, Michel E, Truwit CL. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: utility of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in the detection of cortical and subcortical lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1199-1206.
[5] Lee VH, Wijdicks EF, Manno EM, Rabinstein AA. Clinical spectrum of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, Arch Neurol 2008;65:205-10.
[6] McKinney AM, Short J, Truwit CL, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: incidence of atypical regions of involvement and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:904-12.
[7] Bartynski WS, Boardman JF, Zeigler ZR, Shadduck RK, Lister J. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in infection, sepsis and shock. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:2179-90.
